logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.04.20 2015고정111
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On September 22 and 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) driven a B NAS car under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.134% from the road front of the mutually influoral fluoral end in the luminous death drawings at the time of CYA to the intersection of the shooting distance front of the LAS police station at the same time, while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.134%.

2. On September 5, 2014, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, while under the influence of alcohol at around 0.134% of blood alcohol level, driven a NAS car at the 0.134%, and proceeded to the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the Tong-gu Police Station, which is located in the luminous Death Map at the time of Tong-gu at the time of Tong-gu, the intersection of the shooting distance at the front of the Tong-gu Police Station, from the border of the luminous map to the

There is a signal apparatus installed, but both directions were yellow-off signals at the time. In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to check whether there is a vehicle that temporarily stops or crosses while driving at the intersection, and when another vehicle is already entering the intersection, there was a duty of care to yield the course to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, as long as the Defendant neglected this and entered the intersection, the Defendant’s front front wheel part of the DSS520 car driven by the victim C (Nam and 49 years old) who entered the intersection first and was directly driven by the bank of the Tong-gu Coastal Police Station at the port of the Tong-gu Coastal Police Station (Seoul and 49 years old) was shocked with the front wheel part of the NA520 car driving.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as the cutting of cages of a single bage, other than the cage cage cages, which is the first cage to receive approximately three weeks of medical treatment from the victim due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each statement;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. A report on detection of a de facto driver and a circumstantial statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (2) 2 and Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow