logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2020.10.21 2019고단888
사기등
Text

A fine of KRW 15 million shall be imposed on each of the crimes listed in the judgment of the defendant 1, and a fine of KRW 2,00,000,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 28, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months with prison labor for fraud, etc. in Ansan Branch of the Suwon District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 14, 2015. On June 28, 2018, the Jeju District Court sentenced eight months to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Jeju District Court on July 16, 2018, and the sentence became final and conclusive on July 16, 2018, and completed the execution of the sentence on December 3, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

"2019 Highest 888"

1. The criminal defendant against the victim B is a person who operates the construction business chain D in Jeju City, and the victim B is a person who operates the corporation E, a subcontractor in the above corporation D.

Around June 1, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the said victim that “I would borrow money from the hospital expenses to be incurred in the removal of the model voucher in the Jeju-si F, and will receive money from the said victim until December 30, 2017.”

However, around the above time, the Defendant had already been obligated to pay 16 million won including national taxes in arrears, and there was no intention or ability to pay the above money to the hospital expenses or personal debt repayment.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and up to June 1, 2016 from the above victim, 6 million won to the national bank account in the name of the defendant's father G with his father and wife, and the same year.

6. Oct. 1, 2000 won received a total of KRW 11 million, including KRW 5 million.

B. On April 12, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay waste disposal costs immediately if he/she acted on his/her behalf, because he/she could not directly take procedures, such as reporting on waste disposal related to the removal of the I theater, at the site of removal inside the I theater H in Jeju Island.”

However, even if the above victim paid the waste disposal cost on behalf of the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the waste disposal cost to the above victim later.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the victim as above.

arrow