The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 등 1) 피고인은 2007년 5월 내지 6월 일자불상경 장난으로 피해자가 입은 바지의 무릎 부분을 잡아 당겨 피해자의 바지를 한 뼘 정도 내렸을 뿐이므로 선량한 성적 도덕관념에 반하지 않고, 피해자도 장난으로 느꼈으며 성행위로 인식하지 않았다. 2) 피고인은 2007년 겨울 일자불상경 자신도 모르는 사이에 하의를 벗고 있다가 우연히 피고인의 성기가 피해자의 입 근처에 있게 되었을 뿐이며 피해자의 입 안에 피고인의 성기를 넣으려고 한 사실이 없다.

3) However, the court below found the Defendant guilty of all the charges of this case. The judgment of the court below is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles.

B. The Defendant was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder due to nautical miles and personality disorder, etc. that could not control his behavior at the time of coercion by force.

C. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The crime of indecent act by indecent act by indecent act by indecent act on May 2007 or on June 2007 includes not only the case of indecent act by indecent act after the other party made it difficult to resist by means of assault or intimidation but also the case where the assault itself is deemed an indecent act by indecent act after the other party made it difficult to resist by means of assault or intimidation. The assault in this case does not necessarily need to be the extent that the other party’s will is suppressing.

Indecent acts mean acts that cause sexual humiliation or aversion to the general public and are contrary to good sexual morality, which infringe on the victim’s sexual freedom, and whether it is so, the victim’s intent, gender, age, relationship between the perpetrator and the victim prior to that time, circumstances leading to the act, specific form of conduct, and objective aspects around it.