beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2015 Height148] On May 15, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch on September 4, 2009, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Suwon Detention House.
The Defendant: (a) around January 26, 2012, at the Kafin located in the vice-dong of the members of the Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the Defendant: (b) “I have a great preference in the supply of the school or the operation of the store and supply of the school,” and (c) was awarded the contract on December 201, 201; (b) was awarded the contract for the repair of the source of revenue; and (c) on February 20, 2012, the Defendant was scheduled to receive the award for the repair of the raw grain; and (d) divided the profits by reducing the operating right of the prime rice and the operating right of the store and the profits by reducing the annual rent of KRW 53 million into the school and deposited KRW 26,500,000,000 from March 22, 2012, which is the first day.”
However, in fact, on December 28, 201, a third party has already obtained permission for the use of a store by winning a contract, and the defendant did not have any intention or ability to allow the victim to operate the original rice shop.
The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 5 million in cash from the victim as rent around January 27, 2012, and received KRW 21.5 million from the Defendant’s account on or around the 30th of the same month.
[2015 Height985]
1. Around April 23, 2013, the Defendant against the victim D made a false statement to the victim D at the F cafeteria located in Gyeonggi-si, Gyeonggi-do, that “six persons, among those, retired from the E E educational community, are currently serving as the principal of the school at present.” The Defendant would transfer KRW 3 million to the right to operate the Ansan-si, Busan-si, Middle-si, Middle-si, and Middle-Type, which is the funds for rain.”
However, in fact, since the Ansan Line Middle School shop was closed after September 1, 2009, and there was no plan for sales, the defendant did not have any intention or ability to allow the victim to operate the shop.
The defendant.