The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the defendant is a workplace guard who works for the same company as the victim C.

On August 15, 2014, at around 10:50, the Defendant: (a) committed violence, such as flabing the Defendant’s neck once with his hand on the ground that the Defendant took his satis in the production factory of Yansan-ro 14 (jum), and exercising violence, such as satisfing the Defendant’s sat at one time, and sating the satf, etc.; and (b) inflicted injury on the victim by assaulting the victim, such as flabing satfing the victim’s satch, etc., which requires treatment for about 14 days.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value that makes the judge feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, the defendant is suspected of guilty, even if there is no such evidence.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

(See Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1151 Decided July 22, 2010). B.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court as to the instant case, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor is insufficient to deem that the instant facts charged were proven beyond reasonable doubt, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge this otherwise.

① In an investigative agency and this court, E stated that the Defendant carried fat with C, and the Defendant was satisfing and killed with C, and that the Defendant and C fighting together with F, etc. was satisfing.

However, E did not respond accurately to the counsel's question whether he did not want to refuse to take an oath before giving testimony, and whether he did not call the Defendant at the scene at the time after about one week after the occurrence of the case at the rest room.