Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On March 19, 2020, at around 05:35, the Defendant, within the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan City’s hotel (Seoul, 22 years of age), stolen by using a gap in the amount of 6.5 million won of credit cards, identification cards, cash 6.5 million won (50 million won) that were contained in the victim’s market price, which the victim D (Nam and 22 years of age) opened on the mebbbbbble table, and the victim’s credit cards, identification cards, and cash 6.5 million won (1.30 million won), which were contained in the victim’s mebabbbb, and was stolen by using a gap in the surrounding monitoring.

Summary of Evidence

Each police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the Defendant and the D’s respective internal investigation reports and investigation reports

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. According to Articles 334(1) and 365 of the Criminal Procedure Act, where a defendant who has requested a formal trial on the date of the formal trial procedure fails to appear at the court, the new date shall be set, and where the defendant fails to appear at the court on the new date without justifiable grounds, a judgment may be rendered without a statement of the defendant.

In this case, the Defendant, who requested a formal trial, was lawfully served a writ of summons of the Defendant, and was absent on the first day of September 10, 2020, and thereafter was lawfully served a writ of summons of the Defendant and was absent on the second day of October 20, 2020.

Accordingly, this court proceeded with the trial without the defendant's statement in accordance with Article 458 (2) and Article 365 of the Criminal Procedure Act on the second trial date, and legally designated and notified the trial date for sentencing the judgment on the same day.

A notice of the court date for the adjudication above is effective, regardless of whether the party involved in the case is present at the court, regardless of whether it is actual.

and on the date;