logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.07.29 2016나50161
기타(금전)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 25, 2013, the Plaintiff established a business entity called D (hereinafter “D”) with Defendant, C, etc. and started its business.

B. The above company was established for the purpose of after-school education operation business, private teaching institute operation business, Internet education business, and learning business. For its operation, the Defendant leased from the Plaintiff the second floor of Seocho-gu Seoul E-building 81.39 square meters free of charge.

C. As of June 3, 2013, D’s officers are registered as representative directors and in-house directors, the Defendant, in-house directors, C, F, and auditors G.

After that, the plaintiff, the defendant, and C have different opinions on D's business progress directions, and the above three parties have made a written agreement on the reorganization of the partnership business on June 27, 2013, and the main contents are as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as the agreement in this case). Ⅰ. Arrangement plan

1. The Defendant pays the amount agreed upon to the Plaintiff and C, and the Plaintiff and C transfer the entire share to the Defendant at the time of the final payment.

The payment order will first pay the amount to C and then pay it to the Plaintiff after the end.

Ⅱ. Adjustment of C: The defendant shall pay the agreed amount (30,000,000) to C in the following schedule:

- Until the end of June 2013: 10,000,000 won - until August 5, 2013: 20,000,000 won

Ⅲ. Liquidation of the plaintiff: the defendant shall pay the agreed amount (30,000,000 won) to the plaintiff on the following schedule:

- Until September 5, 2013: 10,000,000 won - up to October 5, 2013: 20,000,000 won - The following:

E. Under the instant agreement, the Defendant paid C KRW 30,000,000.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1 and 3 through 6, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff is a person who received KRW 10,000,000 from the Defendant in accordance with the instant agreement.

Therefore, the Defendant is entitled to receive the instant agreement from the Plaintiff.

arrow