(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.17 2015고정297

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.07.17 2015고정297

폭행치상

Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:30 on September 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 22:30, Nam-gu, Gwangju, 101 Dong 910, and (b) on the ground that the victim G (31 years of age) forced drinking of electric fishing gear, she see both of the Defendant’s hand to see, she was placed at 7-8 times her hair face, she was placed at her hair face, g-8; (b) she was placed on one hand, she was placed at 2-3 sealed her hair; (c) she was engaged in assault on the left side of the wall, and (d) she was frighted at 2-3 occasions, and she was frighted to her head, and she was fright up at 0% of the victim’s left side and she was fright up to the left side of the wall, thereby having the victim take her hair by assaulting her head with her hair her head.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Entry of a copy of the medical certificate of injury to G;

1. Application of the statutes in which an appraisal statement (125 pages) is written;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 262 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Reasons for conviction under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Each legal statement of the witness G and H, consistent with the facts constituting the crime in the judgment, is consistent with the contents of the statement, if the victim excludes the part that the victim did not assault the defendant, and is consistent with his investigation agency's statement, is consistent with the situation, is described in very detail, and is believed in the situation at the time of the crime, and according to the above written appraisal, it can be acknowledged that the victim's avoid is asked at the bottom of the part that was in the room of the victim at the time of the crime in the judgment.

2. The defendant and I, however, have the face of the defendant placed on a bed by the victim in a court or investigative agency.

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2020.11.26 2020고단6735

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.09 2017고단6271

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2015.11.05 2015고합61

-대구지방법원 2014.04.11 2013고합486

-춘천지방법원 영월지원 2015.08.28 2015고단238