The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. At the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant was suffering from alcohol existence at the time of the instant crime, and was in a state of mental disorder or mental disorder under the influence of alcohol.

B. The lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the record as to the assertion of mental disorder, although the defendant has been repeatedly discharged from a hospital specializing in alcohol on several occasions and received medical treatment, it is recognized that the defendant was somewhat drunk at the time of each of the crimes in this case, it does not seem that the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions, considering the circumstances of the crime, the process of the crime, and the defendant's behavior before and after the crime. Therefore, the defendant's mental and physical disorder assertion is without merit.

B. Although the Defendant recognizes all criminal facts as to the assertion of unfair sentencing, and there is no penalty exceeding the fine, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit, on the other hand, considering the fact that the crime is not good in light of the content of the crime, and has been committed repeatedly during the short period of time, the risk of re-offending is high, the victims have not been agreed, and other various circumstances, which form the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., are not too unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.