The Defendants jointly share KRW 145,850,139 to Plaintiff A, and KRW 95,06,759 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money on December 2017.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts 1) The network E (hereinafter “the network”).

on December 10, 2017, at around 05:50 on December 10, 2017, Fone Star Vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Vehicle”).

2) The Plaintiff’s vehicle driving and driving the vehicle, while driving the vehicle on the two-lanes at a point 352 km away from the two-lanes at the parallel of the 352km North Korean Highway, Nam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Gwangju. The Plaintiff’s vehicle turned to the port (hereinafter “the first accident”).

2) After approximately 5 seconds from the Plaintiff, H driving a G Rte car (hereinafter “Defendant 1”) and driving a one-lane on the said expressway had shocked the front part of Defendant 1’s vehicle, which led to the replacement of the part of the back part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s vehicle driven along the front part of the vehicle and the front part of the vehicle led to the front part of the vehicle on which the roof of the driver’s seat runs along the one-lane.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant secondary accident”) and approximately two seconds after the date of the instant secondary accident (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant 2”); and

) The J driving on the said expressway shocked the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle’s front seat and the front part of the driver’s seat of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was driven by Defendant 2 (hereinafter “instant third accident”). In addition, the instant accident, including the instant 1, 2, and 3 accidents, “the instant accident” refers to “the instant accident.”

4) The Deceased died of an accident in the instant case due to a cerebral cerebral cerebral le.

5) The Plaintiff A’s spouse and the Plaintiff B are the deceased’s children, and the Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”).

The insurer is the Defendant Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Federation”) that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to Defendant 1.

) A is a mutual aid project entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant 2, which is a mutual aid project entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement for Defendant 2. [Based on recognition]less dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 5, Eul evidence 1, 2, and 3 (including each number; hereinafter the

each entry or video, the whole purport of the pleading;

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, Defendant 1, and Defendant 1.