logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.10.17 2013노3760
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part on Defendant F is reversed.

Defendant

F. be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

, however, the defendant.

Reasons

【Judgment on Grounds for Appeal】

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds of appeal (the defendant B: imprisonment of October and 118,50,000 additional collection, defendant F: imprisonment of August and imprisonment of August and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. As to the Defendant B’s assertion of unfair sentencing, the fact that the Defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and that there is a family member to support shall be considered as favorable to the Defendant.

However, the crime of this case was committed by the defendant from May 2010 to April 21, 2012 with the trade name " Q" in Suwon-si P. At the same time, the act of arranging sexual traffic was committed while operating two marina business places in the name of "S and U" at the same time. At the same time, the period of the crime is very long. At the same time, in light of the period, method, scale, etc. of the crime of this case, such as the act of arranging sexual traffic by lending the name of another person to several places, U, U, and the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc., the crime of this case is not good. The circumstances after the crime of this case, such as stating that the defendant is not the act of arranging sexual traffic operated by U at the investigative agency, are not good enough. The illegal profits that the defendant obtained from the crime of this case appears to be considerable, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation, family environment, circumstances of the crime and the result after the crime are too unreasonable.

B. As to the Defendant F’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing, the instant crime is likely to impose a strict punishment on the Defendant in light of the fact that the Defendant engaged in speculative acts by using 44 game machines open to the sea, and that there is a great social harm, such as impairing the awareness of sound labor and promoting speculative spirit, etc.

However, the defendant commits the same crime in the past.

arrow