logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2016.11.18 2016고정104
업무방해등
Text

The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and a fine of KRW 3 million, respectively, for the crimes of KRW 1 and 2.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor on November 4, 2015 from the Suwon District Court's Sungnam Branch, and the judgment was finalized on May 13, 2016.

"2016, 104"

1. On April 8, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) around 30 minutes, by force, interfered with the victim’s business of the victim, on the ground that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in a “D” restaurant operated by Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu (hereinafter “D”) and did not return KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000 paid by himself/herself in his/her drinking value; (b) in front of the customer who was a meal at the said place, he/she expressed a desire, such as “the value of his/her own culture and the value of his/her culture and the value

"2016, 105"

2. On June 20, 2015, around 17:10 on June 20, 2015, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s business by force for about 15 minutes, including, but not limited to, the opening of the entrance and the opening of the entrance in front of the entrance, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, obstructed the victim’s business by force.

"2016, 165"

3. Destruction and damage of property, and intrusion upon residence on June 27, 2016 by the Defendant, the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City on June 27, 2016;

F. While finding the main points of “H” operated by the underground victim G(44 years old), the door was destroyed by an unexpected property, such as 2 to 3 times by exposing the steel entrance door leading to the main points of the door, and breaking the lock door by shouldering it with a tight door, thereby destroying the lock door.

The Defendant, without permission, entered the main points managed and operated by the victim through the entrance damaged at the same time as the above paragraph, thereby undermining the peace of the victim’s residence.

Summary of Evidence

"2016, 104"

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. Investigation reports (Investigation, etc. of the shootings) 201,105;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C.

arrow