Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

No one shall sell or provide harmful drugs, such as alcoholic beverages, to juveniles without compensation.

Nevertheless, at around 24:20 on May 5, 2016, the Defendant, at the 3rd floor “C,” located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2016, received a resident registration certificate under the name of “C” from a juvenile from “C,” and did not confirm it properly, and entered the above main points without verifying the identification card of “F (17 years of age, women)”, and then sold two disease and one week, which is a harmful drug, to juveniles, to the above D, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding D;

1. The statement of each police officer made to F and G;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (Cacta ctv video data CD attachment);

1. Article 59 subparagraph 6 of the relevant Act and Article 28 (1) of the Juvenile Protection Act, the selection of fines for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in the instant business establishment where the defendant was on duty, appears to have made efforts to not sell alcoholic beverages to the juvenile by installing machinery capable of verifying the forgery of resident registration certificates, etc., even if the resident registration certificates presented by the juvenile D were erroneous in the process of confirming them by using the above machinery, they sold alcoholic beverages after entering the facility. However, although D's resident registration certificates presented by the juvenile D appear to be similar to D's resident registration certificates, it would be similar to D's relative relative resident registration certificates. In the case of juvenile F, although the defendant did not go through the identification verification procedure, it appears that the other employee had already been confirmed in the course of shift with other employees, and the defendant did not have the same criminal record and currently discontinue the instant business establishment.