Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(b) Summary;

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of the actual condition survey report, traffic accident report, and on-site photographs-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 5-3 (1) 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of failing to take measures after the accident);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the decision of type] shall be limited to the range of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the category 1] and there shall be no escape [the scope of the recommended punishment] after the bodily injury [the range of the recommended punishment] [the range of the recommended punishment and the recommended punishment], the basic area of imprisonment for August through January 16 [the scope of the recommended punishment revised according to the sentencing guidelines], imprisonment for one year to one year (the lowest limit of the sentencing range recommended by the sentencing guidelines is inconsistent with the statutory minimum limit of the applicable punishment, and the minimum limit of the applicable punishment in law] * The two crimes are in a commercial competition relationship, and the sentencing guidelines are not applicable, but shall be examined by reference;

2. In light of the circumstances of the decision on sentence sentence, the defendant's responsibility is not minor;

In particular, even though the defendant has been punished several times for various traffic-related crimes in the past, there is a high possibility of criticism in that the crime of this case has been committed.

Until now there has been no agreement with the victim.

However, the defendant recognizes his mistake and is against his will.

There is no criminal punishment after 2005.

As the vehicle of the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, the damage suffered by the victim seems to have been compensated to some extent.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and various circumstances revealed in the trial process shall be determined as ordered.