logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.11 2018고단6514
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months and by a fine not exceeding 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 23, 2018, the Defendant interfered with his duties: (a) around 12:30 on October 23, 2018, at the cafeteria managed by the victim C in Suwon-si B, the Defendant: (b) under the influence of alcohol, she took a large voice with the intention of evading the fright and the vision attached thereto; and (c) obstructed the management of the cafeteria operated by the victim by force, such as cutting the fright through the planting of the table.

2. At around 13:25 on October 23, 2018, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E, a police officer belonging to the Suwon Police Station D District D District of the Suwon Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant franked the cafeteria as indicated in paragraph (1) on October 23, 2018, by openly insulting the victim by putting the victim’s desire, such as “the bit of bitch bitch bitch bitch,” among customers of the said restaurant.

3. At around 13:30 on October 23, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the E’s chest part of a police officer, who was dispatched upon receipt of a report, who was urged by the police officer E to return home from the restaurant set forth in paragraph (1).

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the police officer's performance of duties on 112 report processing.

4. On October 23, 2018, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 13:40 on October 23, 2018, the Defendant committed an act of disturbance revocation at a government office between approximately 20 minutes, such as: (b) the Defendant, at the D District District of the Suwon Police Station D, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, who was caught after the arrest of a flagrant offender for the criminal facts under the preceding paragraph, by inserting the flabbb wres. The Defendant collected and inserted the flab wres of this flab wres; and (c) the Defendant, at approximately 20 minutes of the flab wres, expressed the flob flo

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on investigation, or photograph that assaults a police officer outside a cafeteria;

1. Scell photographs by cutting down CCTVs at a restaurant and by cutting down on-site CCTVs for crime prevention;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (Interference with business, choice of imprisonment), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the obstruction of performance of official duties

arrow