The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In the instant case where there is no change in the sentencing conditions that may be considered when the judgment was rendered, the Defendant had the history of fine several times for the same violent crime and having been sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment, even the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspended sentence due to the same kind of crime, and even the victims did not recover from damage, and other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, sex, environment, health conditions, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it is difficult to view the lower court’s sentence to be unfair because it exceeded the discretionary scope, and it is difficult to view that the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.