beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, each of the defendants M, D, C, and B shall be punished by imprisonment for six months, defendant I, and CV, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2] Defendant M was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months with labor for a computer or other use by the Incheon District Court on October 15, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 25, 2016. Defendant I was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for a computer or other use of a computer at the Incheon District Court on March 30, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 7, 2016. Defendant CV was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a computer or other use of a computer at the Incheon District Court on March 17, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 25, 2016.
[2] On May 31, 2015, the Defendants: (a) received orders from the Organization of Washington in China from BS (the Seoul Central District Court, Jul. 31, 2015, which was detained in the form of fraud, etc.); and (b) received one order from the Organization of Washington in China; and (c) subsequently withdrawn money from the name of the title holder of the passbook in the name of the one of the one of the one of the one under the name of the one under the name of the one under the name of the one under the name of the one under the one under the name of the other; (d) received money from the latter; and (e) delivered money received to the designated entity of the one under the name of the one under the name of the one under the name of the one under the name of the one under the name of the latter; and (e) received 1% of the amount of money to be withdrawn from the other under the name of the latter; and (e) agreed to receive 250 million won per day from the date of failure or failure to withdraw.
1. Defendant A
A. According to the above conspiracys as to the crime against the victim DF, the employee in charge of the name scam scam scam scamscam scamscams by telephone call from the victim DF on May 28, 2015, and “in order to investigate whether the name of the head of the Tong was stolen and illegal, he/she should deposit the money of the head of the Tong into the account designated by the National Tax Service.
“Falsely speaking to the effect that it is “,” and its affiliation to the bank account (DH) opened in the name of DG from the injured party. 24,000.