A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

D is a person who operates an illegal game room in FPC on the first floor of the building located in the Silsan-si E in Changwon-si, and the defendant is a worker who is in charge of money exchange work to assist customers in the convenience of customers in the game room.

D and the defendant, using other remaining game products, the rating classification of which is different from that of the game in line with the contents of the rating classification, intended to exchange points that the game site customers acquired by the game in line with the rating classification.

D From the beginning of September 2013 to October 17, 2013, 2013, D installed another remaining game program where a manager page is installed, unlike the contents rated by the Game Rating Board at the above FPC, on six computers, and installed a horse program which was not classified into one computer unit to attract customers of a game room while operating a business. The Defendant exchanged the scores obtained from the game from October 2013 to October 17, 2013 by exchanging the scores obtained from customers to 10,000 won per 10,000.

As a result, the defendant and D provided game products different from the contents of the rating classification and those of the customers who did not receive the rating in the above game room, and operated the game room business for money exchange according to the scores obtained through the use of the game.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutors' office and police suspect interrogation protocol concerning D;

1. Each statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Relevant Articles 44 (1) 2, 32 (1) 1 and 7, subparagraph 4 of Article 45, and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry concerning criminal facts, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment with labor

1. From among concurrent offenders, the sentence is inevitable on the ground that the crime was committed again during the period of suspended execution for the same kind of crime as the sentencing of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

However, the scale and scale of the crime;