1. The defendant's delivery of the Category D of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Building from the plaintiff at the same time 230,000 won to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On November 4, 2016, the Plaintiff concluded a lease agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant to lease the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Cbuilding D (hereinafter “instant real estate”) with the term of lease from February 24, 2017 to February 24, 2019, the deposit amount of KRW 230,000, and KRW 00.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

On November 4, 2016, the Plaintiff paid 12,000,000 won as down payment, and 218,000,000 won as the remainder on February 24, 2017, respectively, to the Defendant, and paid 230,000,000 won as deposit.

C. On February 24, 2019, the instant lease agreement was explicitly renewed. On April 2, 2019, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a certificate that the instant lease agreement would be terminated, and the said certificate reaches the Defendant on April 3, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry in Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including each number for a case with a serial number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the instant lease agreement was terminated on July 3, 2019 after three months from April 3, 2019, when the notice of termination of the contract was delivered to the Defendant pursuant to Article 6-2 of the Housing Lease Protection Act. Thus, the Defendant is obliged to return the deposit deposit amount of KRW 230,000,000 to the Plaintiff simultaneously with the delivery of the instant real estate from the Plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.