logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.09.11 2015나7390
손해배상(기)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

(1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (A), KRW 262,839,282, and KRW 282.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court's explanation on this part of the facts are as follows: (a) the obligation of collateral security (right to collateral security) of the first instance court's decision No. 4, 9 on the ground that it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, in addition to changing the "this court" of No. 6, 11 into the "court of the first instance", and (b) thereby cite it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant Company, D, and E

A. The grounds for the court's explanation on this part of the arguments by the parties are as follows, except for the change of the part of Article 2-A (2) of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2) Each movable listed in the separate sheet is an accessory or accessory to the real estate of this case, and the defendant company acquired ownership on December 25, 2009 as well as an immovable property of this case. Thus, the plaintiff cannot assert the ownership of each movable property listed in the separate sheet against the defendant company, D, E (hereinafter all the above defendants). The plaintiff did not acquire the ownership of each movable property listed in the separate sheet because it was not delivered with possession of each movable property listed in the separate sheet, and the defendant company, D, E (hereinafter all the above defendants) did not acquire the ownership of each movable property of this case during the process of removing the real estate of this case and the plaintiff's new auction on December 25, 2009.

arrow