1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From July 5, 2012 to July 11, 2012, the Plaintiff, who served as delivery service, was in excess of 10:40 on board and delivering a bicycle (hereinafter “the instant disaster”) and filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on September 10, 2012, following the diagnosis of “the aggregate of 7:8 dule 10,00,000 dule 8,000,000 dule dule dule dule dule, the right upper part of the upper part of the back part of the back part of the back part of the right shoulder (hereinafter “the applicant’s disease”).

B. On October 4, 2012, the Defendant approved the Plaintiff’s medical care in relation to “the cage cage fage 7 and 8 cage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fages, dump dump fump fump fage fump, dump dump fump fump, and dump fump fump fage fump,” and the Defendant’s medical care non-approval disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) in accordance with his opinion of advisory advice.

【Ground of recognition】An absence of dispute, and description of Gap evidence 1

2. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is clear that the instant injury and disease occurred due to the instant disaster, and the medical doctor of the film department and the external medical specialist was diagnosed.

Therefore, the injury and disease of this case should be recognized as occupational accidents.

3. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. In full view of the facts acknowledged, the following medical opinions can be acknowledged in light of Gap evidence 1 to 5, Eul evidence 1 to 9, the results of the examination of medical records commissioned to the head of the Seoul Hospital of the relevant court, the results of the examination of medical records to the head of the relevant Seoul Hospital, and the results of the fact-finding conducted to the members of the C prison, and the purport

1) A doctor’s opinions (Written opinion dated December 27, 2012, and the inquiry of the fact-finding on September 26, 2014) - Although the first X-ray opinion was not visible due to the initial X-ray’s opinion, MRI CHEC after the end-up of the MaRK and the part-waveing part of the revolving. - Along with the upper part of the upper part of the upper part of the body, the upper part of the body and the upper part of the body and the upper part of the body and the body and body and body of the body and body of the body and body of the body and body of the body and body of the body and body were