beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of 1 year, Defendant C, D, and E, by imprisonment of 5 months.
(b).
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 2013, Defendant A and Defendant B accepted that Defendant B, who was introduced as a registration agent of the passenger vehicle, registered the passenger vehicle as a large-sized vehicle, and requested to request the registration agent of the passenger vehicle to register the vehicle as a large-sized vehicle. Defendant B, who worked in the office of the administrative agent and was in charge of the business of transferring the name of the vehicle, accepted the registration fee of five million won per vehicle.
On May 6, 2013, Defendant A provided Defendant B with necessary documents and fees for the transfer of the seven cargo vehicles, such as J, and Defendant B, despite the fact that the said seven vehicles were purchased by Defendant B, who pretended to have been transferred by the said seven vehicles at the time, submitted to the office of the administrative agency and submitted the certificate of transfer of the said vehicles to the office of the administrative agency, and submitted to the office of the office of the office of the office of the said office the certificate of transfer of the said vehicles that the said vehicles sold the said vehicles to Korea, and had the said vehicles registered as the ownership transfer of the said vehicles owned by the said office.
In addition, in the indictment on May 20, 2013, Defendant A issued the registration documents to Defendant A on or around May 16, 2013 in the indictment, and indicted Defendant A on or around May 20, 2013 as to the registration of the cargo vehicles listed in the attached list 8 through 14. The public prosecutor of the public trial at the fourth public trial, the registration date listed in the above No. 8 through 14 was around May 16, 2013. However, in full view of Defendant A’s statement, Defendant A issued the registration documents to Defendant B on or around May 20, 2013, Defendant A issued the registration documents to change the registration date to K. The indictments and amendments to the indictments are clear that both are due to mistake and that the above amendments to the indictments are not disadvantageous to the Defendants ex officio, thereby recognizing Defendant A as the date of May 20, 2013.
1.2 Rabs.