The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was aware that the Defendant’s act of treating rasher’s macker’s marction and the marction and marcation is an eligible recipient of the medical care benefits, and thus, the Defendant had no intention to defraudation that the Defendant first requested the medical care benefits.

Even if the facts charged in this case are found guilty, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court against the Defendant (an amount of KRW 3 million) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of fact, the Defendant is aware that at least the costs for treating salt in the process of the rasher’s marization and the procedure for the removal of summer and sulma may not be subject to the benefits for medical care, but it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant claimed medical care benefits and medical benefits to the National Health Insurance Corporation and the local governments, without recognizing the aforementioned costs.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case is just and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts as pointed out by the defendant and affecting the conclusion

Therefore, this part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.

① The Defendant himself was aware of the fact that the rasher’s surgery and the mathy and mathy surgery themselves do not constitute an eligible recipient of medical care.

Recognizing that the act of treating salt that may arise in the course of the procedure may not be considered as benefits for medical care.

I seem to appear.

② Furthermore, if it is unclear whether the above expenses incurred in treating salt is eligible for medical care benefits, the Defendant.