A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Force” On June 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by the Seoul Northern District Court for interference with the performance of official duties, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence in the Seoul Northern District Court’s detention center on December 6, 2015.

【Criminal facts” around March 18, 2018. Around 02:25, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in front of a restaurant “D” in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and was required to take measures for returning home from the Inspector F of the Seoul C District Police Station, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a report of 112 that there was a person in need of protective measures. Nevertheless, without returning home, the Defendant was able to take measures for returning home from the guard F of the Seoul C District Police Station to the site without returning home, and the Defendant was not in danger to the road.

As we want to see the place of “F,” I expressed to the F that “I will see humma, humf such humf as humf, bottled, dead humf,” and humfed F with the left face of F on its own hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by F who is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Police photographs damaged;

1. Previous records: References to inquiries, requests for criminal records of the same kind of criminal suspect, data on the status of his/her identification, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the investigation (reports attached to the same criminal

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes [ although the defendant asserts mental and physical weakness, it cannot be recognized solely for the reason that he was under the influence of alcohol, and no other evidence to acknowledge it exists];

The defendant's reason for sentencing is against the time of committing the crime of this case.

In this case, the defendant's son and son wish to take the action.

However, the defendant was punished several times for the same crime.

In addition, since the sentence was sentenced to a prison life, it is necessary to pay more attention to prevent recidivism.