Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) calculated by ordering food at the “D” restaurant managed by the Victim C in the Victim C in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu B and the second floor on September 5, 2017; and (b) prevented the front entrance of the drunk; and (c) prevented the Defendant from drinking.

The phrase "I am a great interest, I am a chair, and am a fire extinguisher, and let the people leave the door by getting the door.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

2. On September 5, 2017, the Defendant: (a) reported at the same place as before and after around 18:40 on September 5, 2017, that “A guest, who ever ever ever ever taken, was locked at the entrance of a store; and (b) sent out to the site by F, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gwanak-gu Police Station E box, who caused the Defendant to cause the Defendant, and gets out of and going home, and gets out of, the victim’s buckbucks; (c) continued to walk back the buckbucks of the victim; and (d) continued to stop the bucks of the surrounding players, pluck up, pl up, and buck up the bucks of the breast with his head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F;

1. A written statement in C and G preparation;

1. Application of photographic Acts and subordinate statutes attached to the investigation report;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention of a workhouse are as follows: (a) Defendant interfered with restaurant business under the influence of alcohol; and (b) Defendant assaulted the police officer to have the Defendant returned home; and (c) the characteristics of the instant crime.

The defendant shows an attitude against the defendant to recognize the crime of this case, and interferes with the business after the conclusion of the trial.