Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

When the defendant does not pay a fine, one hundred thousand won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

On July 1, 2015, around 22:54, the Defendant intruded into a female toilet on the first floor of the pertinent building in order to see the appearance of women, such as D (n, 30 years of age) and other women, in the middle-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C1.

Accordingly, the Defendant invadedd the above building management site E in opposition to the intention of the E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statements by the accused in court (afford that entry into female toilets is recognized);

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV image verification (satise form) / [The Defendant denies the crime to the effect that he/she did not know that he/she was a female toilet due to a sudden change of melt.

① However, D called “the toilet screen was phoneed by the male head and head, and it was called to play after male, and the male worship was left to the public room with the toilet, and it was consistently and specifically stated in the investigative agency and court as to the form of crime and the conditions before and after the crime, and there is no doubt that the statement was false.

(2) In CCTV images, it is evident that the Defendant’s walk around a female toilet and a corridor with male toilets prior to the occurrence of the instant case. However, it is not easy to view that the Defendant, who was not entering a toilet, was in the vicinity of a toilet, to the extent that he could not be able to distinguish between male and female toilets.

③ In addition, according to the result of the examination of evidence, there is a room for male toilets on the side of the instant female toilet, and there is an easy space to distinguish between men and women. However, even if the Defendant, who is an adult male, she did not confirm it and entered a female toilet, it is not understood that the Defendant went to the female toilet in light of the empirical rule.

④ If the side of the Defendant’s assertion was melted, it would have been reported only if it had been used, and this part and head are above the base, so far as they appear from the side partitions.