logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 (춘천) 2016.01.20 2015노216
강도상해
Text

All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

The lower court acquitted the Defendant of the part of the facts charged of this case, although the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the prosecutor’s fact-finding, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the gist of the grounds for appeal, the victim suffered the same injury as indicated in the facts charged of this case, and the upper part

The sentence of the court below's unfair sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too uneased and unfair.

Defendant

The sentence of the court below is too unreasonable because the sentence is too large.

Judgment

In fact, the summary of the facts charged in this case and the summary of the facts charged in this case’s judgment of the court below on July 21, 2015, the defendant tried to deduct the victim C (hereinafter referred to as 76 years old, female) from his/her shoulder and gold rums, which he/she had worn on the left hand, in both hands, around 05:40 on July 21, 2015, but the victim tried to completely resist. However, the victim’s bridge part was walked one time, and then flick part of the victim’s chest part was flicked one time by drinking, and then flick part of the victim’s chest part was flick, and flicked by the victim, and flicked the victim, and caused the victim’s injury, such as brain flick, etc., for which two weeks’ treatment is required.

The court below found the victim not guilty of robbery injury on the ground that the victim's injury caused by the crime of this case was minor injury that could normally occur in robbery or naturally improved injury that could not be seen as injury to robbery in the course of robbery, and that the victim's injury cannot be seen as injury to robbery among the injury caused by the crime of this case. The court below found the victim guilty of robbery of robbery on the ground that the injury cannot be seen as injury to robbery. The court below found the victim guilty of robbery as to the robbery in relation to the crime of this case.

First of all, the determination of the party shall be as follows: (a) brain micum, (b) 2 government spons, and (c) sphere sphere sphere sphere sphere

arrow