logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.12.14 2017누73152
과징금부과처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding or changing some contents as follows. Thus, it is cited by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In front of the 5th 18th 18th 10th 1 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff added “The content of the instant adjustment concerning the instant land share constitutes an inherited property division agreement, and thus, the instant disposition does not exist.”

The 6th decision of the first instance court is replaced by “No one,” and thus, the plaintiffs’ above assertion premised on this is without merit.”

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as all grounds are groundless.

arrow