Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Power】 On May 30, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million from the Daegu District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and 3.5 million from the same court on July 14, 2010 to a fine for the same crime, etc. respectively.

【Criminal Facts】 On April 28, 2012, at around 00:41, the Defendant driven a B low-speed car with a blood alcohol content of at least 0.091% under the influence of alcohol without a car driver’s license, from a section of about 500 meters from the front to the front road of the Royal Islands, where the injury in his/her south-do, Haak-gun, Haak-gun, Haak-gun, Haak-gun, is in the same way as Do

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. The circumstantial statement of the driver, the report on detection of the driver, the report on the completion of correction, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Records before judgment: Application of criminal records, etc. and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. The provisions of Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act (the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act, the punishment of violation of the Road Traffic Act with heavier punishment, and the selection of fines);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is examined, and the defendant has already been punished more than twice as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, such as the criminal records in the judgment, and drives a vehicle without a driver's license, as stated in the judgment, even though he had the record of punishment more than twice as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act. Therefore, the defendant needs to be sentenced to a punishment corresponding

On the other hand, however, the defendant seems to have a difficult living, and all criminal facts in the judgment of the investigation agency have been recognized and reflected.

Such circumstances and records of the instant case.