The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (two million won of a fine) is too unlimited and unfair.

2. Determination

A. There are extenuating circumstances, such as the fact that the Defendant was not subject to a sentence, and the Defendant’s confessions of a crime, and the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle operated without good health conditions is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy.

B. On the other hand, the crime of this case is not against the defendant's responsibility in light of the fact that the defendant caused a traffic accident that shocks pedestrians, and that the crime of this case is not good, and that the victim does not suffer from an injury that requires 8 weeks medical treatment, and that it is not against the victim's liability.

C. In light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as the Defendant’s age, family relationship, living environment, motive, details and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the sentence of the lower court is adequate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.