1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. There is no dispute between the parties to the underlying facts, or comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in each statement in subparagraphs 1 and 2, the Plaintiff and the appointed parties acquired shares of 1/4 of the instant forest land on July 8, 2016, and the designated parties E acquired shares of 2/4 of the instant forest land on the same day, and the Defendant may recognize the fact that the Plaintiff is the owner of F forest land, which is adjacent to the instant forest land, 317 cubic meters.

2. On the premise that two graves owned and managed by the Defendant are installed within the forest of this case, the Plaintiff seeking payment of rent for the possession and use of the forest of this case from June 30, 2016 to June 30, 2016.

The evidence presented by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that the two graves asserted by the Plaintiff are installed within the forest of this case. The Plaintiff’s claim premised on this is without merit without need to further examine.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.