logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.11.10 2016나9324
사용료
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. Based on the litigation materials and arguments submitted to the appellate court citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the court of first instance has sufficient grounds for admitting the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (such as law, precedents, interpretation and application of legal principles, recognition of facts and facts requiring proof, and judgment on the issues, etc.).

The reasons to be stated by this court are the same as the reasons in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts or additions. Thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Each “(value-added Tax)” written from the fifth page of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is written or added, shall be limited to “(value-added Tax)” (including part of value-added tax).

The following is added between the 6th judgment of the first instance and the 13th judgment.

“The Defendant did not add any assertion in the appellate trial or submit any further evidence (the Defendant did not submit any written statement after submitting a petition of appeal that did not state the grounds for appeal on June 16, 2016, and did not appear on the date of pleadings). No other circumstance to revoke the judgment of the first instance ex officio is found.”

3. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and it is difficult to recognize that the defendant's appeal has justifiable grounds.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow