logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.18 2015가단5075974
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The defendant has caused the plaintiff to recover the title of the real estate stated in the attached Form.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. According to the Land Survey Book drawn up during the Japanese occupation period, “C” was registered as being subject to the assessment on November 15, 1913, but the address of the situation person is not separately indicated.

B. The land under the assessment of the instant case became the real estate indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) through the following division, land category change, area conversion registration, administrative district change, etc., and the Defendant registered the preservation of ownership of the instant land as the receipt of No. 470 on January 16, 1996 by the Jung-gu District Court’s Seoul District Court registry office.

C. On May 28, 1918, the Plaintiff’s pre-paid C died, and D, his/her South-North Korea, inherited family and inherited property. On January 20, 1951, upon the death of the said D, E, his/her South-North Korea, inherited family and inherited property.

E deceased on February 14, 1985 and died on August 31, 2002 by F, who is his wife, jointly succeeded to the property of the network of Plaintiffs G, H, I, I, and J, who are their children. On November 27, 2014, the inheritors jointly agreed to divide the inherited property owned by the Plaintiff.

[Reasons for Recognition] Evidence A1, Evidence A2, Evidence A4-1, 2, A5, Evidence A7, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. A person registered in the land investigation register for the cause of a claim as the owner shall be presumed to have been determined by the land owner, unless there is any counter-proof such as the change in the situation by the adjudication, etc., and the situation shall be presumed to have been determined. Therefore, if a person registered in the land investigation register for a certain land dies and his/her heir remains, unless there is any circumstance to deem that his/her ownership was transferred to a third party after the fact that there is a forest land, the heir of the property by the

In this case, according to the health records, the facts acknowledged earlier, and the evidence No. 16.

arrow