logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2016.02.16 2014가단10130
소유권확인
Text

1. The defendant Republic of Korea shall have the respective inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet of final inheritance shares among the real estate listed in the separate sheet.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is in the process of jointly setting ACCC 8 years old AD, which was settled in AB at the time of racing.

B. AE forest 21,818 square meters in the forest register before the subdivision of the racing before the subdivision is indicated in the forest register as being subject to the assessment by AF, AG, and AH on November 20, 1917, and thereafter, it is divided into each land listed in the separate sheet on May 29, 2009 (hereinafter “instant land”) and is currently unregistered.

C. Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, and L are those who inherit the property of AF (AI at the time of racing, including the following items: Defendant M, N,O, P, Q, Q, R, M, T, U,V, and W are those who inherit the property of AG (AG, permanent address, and AJ at the time of racing, as shown in attached Form No. 1 (1). Defendant X,Y, Z, Z, and AA are those who inherit the property of AH (AJ at the time of racing, permanent address, and racing) in succession as described in attached Form No. 2 (2). The above Defendants’ inheritance shares are as listed in attached Form No. 3 (A, permanent address, and racing).

【Defendant 1-1-19 of the Civil Procedure Act” 【Defendant 1-2 of the Republic of Korea, B, D, F, K, and L

2. Determination on Defendant Republic of Korea’s defense prior to the merits

A. Defendant Republic of Korea asserts that, even if the instant land was not unregistered, Defendant Republic of Korea’s purport of the defense prior to the merits of this case’s land is a state in which the person under whose circumstances and his successors can be specified, and Defendant Republic of Korea does not deny the ownership of the person under whose circumstances the instant land and his successors. Therefore, the Plaintiff did not have a benefit to seek confirmation of ownership of the instant land against

B. The claim for confirmation of land ownership against the State is unregistered and the land is not registered on the land cadastre or forest land cadastre, or the registrant is unknown, or the State is otherwise.

arrow