Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant A, No. 8, 9, seized evidence No. 8, and No. 3.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, along with their names, told that they had been involved in an offense by misrepresenting to the investigation agency by making a phone to the unspecified number of people residing in the country and leading them to a false criminal act. Defendant A, by deceiving the account number of the bank account in his name, shall be transferred to the safety account in order to trace the financial transaction. Defendant A, by informing the account number of the bank account in his name to the above telephone, sent the account number of the bank account in his name to the above person. Defendant A, upon deposit of the above account, was the so-called so-called “passing” that the bank would withdraw it from the bank and deliver it to the third party and receive 3% of the amount of the withdrawal from the above name from the above non-known person. Defendant B, upon delivery of the amount of damage from the withdrawal account from the above non-known person to receive KRW 100,000,000 per day, intended to take the part of the money to transfer it to the non-indicted person or to deliver it to another accomplice.

On April 8, 2015, the above-mentioned person was called the victim F(the age of 46) by phone call to the victim F(the age of 46) and misrepresented the Seoul Central District Inspection Inspection, and the above-mentioned passbook was opened by theft of personal information and used for the crime of the above passbook, so cooperation in investigation is expected to cooperate, and the above-mentioned passbook was moved to the virtual account safely.

In fact, at around 12:25 on the same day, the victim believed this to be the victim transferred KRW 31,00,000 deposited in the new bank account (H) in the name of the bank in the name of the bank in the name of the defendant A by using Internet bankinging. As above, the above-mentioned person who was accused of the victim was instructed the defendants to act by telephone according to the role assigned to each of the defendants, and the defendant A was the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Meroro on the same day.