The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in light of the following circumstances: The defendant made a confession and reflect on all of the crimes of this case; the defendant appears to have committed a crime to raise living expenses in an unstable environment; the defendant's additional delay was affected by the defendant's disability; the beneficiary of basic living expenses was faced with economic difficulties; in the case of embezzlement of this case, the driver's school learning car which is damaged is returned to the victim; damage caused by seized articles appears to have been returned to the victims; however, the defendant's crime of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thie) of this case is deemed to have invaded upon his residence over a considerable period of time; the damage amount caused by the larceny (as approximately 15 million won); the victim and the defendant did not reach the first instance court; the defendant was punished twice by imprisonment with prison labor for the larceny of this case; the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for less than two years (one more times, more than one more times); the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of this case; the defendant's imprisonment with prison labor for less than one year and six months (one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-one-year term term).