logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2019.06.21 2019고단322
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 10:00 on March 16, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay interest equivalent to 25% of the loan on the face of the loan, with the amount to be received by the principal in contact with the company in KRW 600 million,” by phoneing the victim B, who is a senior high school, to the next high school, to the effect that “on the face of the change in the name of the company.”

However, in fact, the defendant was not in a situation where the defendant can receive the above KRW 600 million, and there was no intention or ability to repay the above money even if he borrowed money from many people and did not repay it.

Nevertheless, as above, the defendant deceivings the victim as above, and 3 million won with the post office account (C) in the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant for the same day from the victim, and 4 million won with the same account around the 19th day of the same month, and the same year.

5. around 25. Around 25.0, one million won was remitted to the account of community credit cooperatives (D) in the name of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

On October 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the F&O agency located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on the part of the Defendant: “At the time of the purchase of a vehicle with a low-priced engine in the name of the victim, the Defendant sold the vehicle with a low-priced engine and had incentives therefor. If the vehicle was transferred after the purchase of a vehicle with a low-priced engine in the name of the victim, the victim would pay 50,000 won in cash for the two months of the installment of the vehicle previously held by the victim, and pay the principal of the purchase of the vehicle until then.”

However, in fact, the Defendant had already paid the installment to other persons by the so-called "losting machine", and disposed of the installment even after the passenger car was transferred from the victim, and used it as repayment of the existing debt, payment of credit card payment, etc.

arrow