The punishment of the accused shall be determined by a year of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 13, 2006, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court’s Ansan Branch, and on January 17, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions in the period of imprisonment for the violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Sungwon District Court’s Sungnam branch on June 17, 2007. On June 21, 2014, the Defendant was a person who has been in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions. On the same day, from the front side of the Suwon District Court’s “Sstrentonel” to the road, the “ON” in the same way from 150 meters away from the front side of the Sinpo City’s Sinpoon to the road.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes entered in criminal records;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act that the detention of the accused would result in excessive difficulty

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 (1) and (2) of the Act on Probation, etc.;