beta
Text
The Defendants shall be exempted from punishment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 13, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year for special larceny at the Daejeon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 21, 2016.
Defendant
B On June 10, 2016, the Daejeon District Court sentenced two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Daejeon District Court, which became final and conclusive on October 21, 2016.
Defendant
C On June 10, 2016, the Daejeon District Court sentenced 1 year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny at the Daejeon District Court, which became final and conclusive on October 21, 2016.
Defendant
D On June 10, 2016, the Daejeon District Court sentenced 2 years of suspension of execution to 8 months of imprisonment for special larceny, which became final and conclusive on October 21, 2016.
2. The Defendants planned to do so by making so so so so that the Defendants were able to brying the mobile phone apparatus on the side of the locked, and the Defendant A planned to drive the vehicle to the place of crime, and Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D entered a sobrying bank to take the role of driving the vehicle to the place of crime, and to take the role of driving the vehicle with the mobile phone equipment from a sobrying bank.
On October 11, 2015, the Defendants moved from the vehicle driven by Defendant A to the inside of the vehicle, and wait in the vehicle before H S Bana located in Ansan-si on October 11, 2015. Defendant C had one smartphone, which was owned by the victim’s name in the said place. Defendant B had one set of a smartphone, which was owned by the victim’s name in the said place, and Defendant B had one set of the said soup bank, which was located in Ansan-si I, and had one set of a smartphone in the said soup bank. Defendant B had one million won at the market price owned by the victim K, who was divingd at the said place. Defendant B had one set of a smartphone, which was owned by the victim in the said soup bank, and had one set of a smartphone, which was owned by the victim’s name in the said place.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to steal the victims' property.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ each.