The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the fact that the defendant's summary of the grounds for appeal is against the law, the punishment of the court below (two years of imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and suspended execution) against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant’s mistake against the Defendant and the Defendant did not repeat the crime; the period of the crime is relatively short and the game equipment used for the crime was seized; the Defendant is not identical to that of the Defendant; the Defendant’s economic situation is not good; and there are family members to support.

However, such as the crime of this case, the illegal game room business, such as the crime of this case, is likely to instigate a speculative spirit, reduce the desire to work, thereby causing economic distress to customers, which is highly harmful to society, and the establishment of 50 game machine, and the scale of crime cannot be said to be small, and the method of crime is not good, and there is a large number of criminal charges against the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances, such as the character, conduct, environment, etc. of the Defendant, the lower court appears to have taken into account most favorable circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances that would vary between the lower court and the sentence.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.