logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.10.28 2014고단5170
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 7, 2014, the Defendant abused a taxi engineer on the ground of assaulting him/her at around 23:20 on July 7, 2014, and arrested him/her as a flagrant offender at his/her head and transferred him/her from the police box to the Southern Police Station within the patrol vehicle, and committed assault, such as receiving two-time shoulders of D’s left upper part of his/her patrol box, and having his/her head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties by police officers on criminal investigation.

2. On July 8, 2014, at around 00:20 on July 8, 2014, the Defendant damaged public goods, the Defendant refused to treat the drunk hospital at the parking lot for the Seoul White Hospital located within the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and damaged the repair cost of KRW 224,840,00 by walking the glass behind the Eone Star Cornex, belonging to the Southern Southern Police Station, while leaving the dong.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged patrol cars, which are goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to F, D, G, and H;

1. Photographs of the damaged parts of the police and photographs of the police vehicles of the scientific investigation team;

1. Application of the written estimate for vehicle damage;

1. Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act and Articles 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of damage to public goods and the choice of fines) and Article 136 (1) (the occupation of obstruction of performance of official duties and the choice of fines);

1. Of concurrent crimes, the punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, or Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel asserts that the defendant and his/her defense counsel stated that they had no memory at the time of the instant crime under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime to the effect that they were in the state of mental disorder or mental disability.

According to the records, although it is recognized that the defendant was a state of drinking at the time of the crime, he/she had no ability to discern things or make decisions due to such fact.

(b) the State or a local government-invested institution.

arrow