logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.03.18 2014고단1202
사기등
Text

A fine of KRW 3,00,00 shall be imposed on the crime No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant with respect to the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of bodily injury in the Jeonju District Court's Militarysan Branch for the same year.

2. 14. The above judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On November 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) purchased a BranHG car from Ucar Co., Ltd., a company selling used cars in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) via employees of the above U.S., the Defendant: (c) drafted an application form for a vehicle to pay KRW 21,50,000 to the victim Co., Ltd., Ltd. for a vehicle purchase fund for 48 months, with the amount of KRW 653,107, monthly payment for 48 months.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to repay even if he received an automobile installment loan from the victim company.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim company, had the victim company transfer KRW 21,50,000 of the above passenger car purchase price to Ukk corporation on the same day, thereby purchasing BranHG passenger car.

Accordingly, the defendant could not pay the victim 21,500,000 won by deceiving the victim company.

2. Around November 28, 2013, the Defendant created a mortgage on KRW 10,750,000 with respect to the claim amounting to KRW 10,750,000 on the part of the victim company as the mortgagee, after obtaining an automobile installment loan from the Defendant’s Matts Capital Co., Ltd., Ltd., the victim company as the mortgagee.

After that, the Defendant was faced with economic difficulties such as shortage of living expenses, and the Defendant paid only KRW 756,520 until February 5, 2014, and delayed the payment of the remainder of the installment, and obstructed the exercise of another’s rights by concealing the said vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was the object of the rights of the victim company, around March 10, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the police statement concerning C;

1. A copy of an application for secondhand loan, the register of automobiles;

1. A previous conviction in judgment:

arrow