The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The judgment is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for a similar crime and again re-offending around August 2019, which is one month after the execution of the sentence was completed, and that the amount of the Metetrapas handled is not significant.

On the other hand, the attitude of recognizing and opposing the crime of this case is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, the Defendant’s assertion is not acceptable on the grounds that the sentence of the lower court is too unreasonable, comprehensively taking account of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family environment, motive and background of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the conclusion is groundless.