Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fines of three thousand won,00,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by fines of one thousand won,00,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a commercial sex dealing business establishment with the trade name of “D” with facilities such as eight smuggling rooms, one waiting room for female employees, one toilet, and a camera in the three floors of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C building.

On November 18, 2014, the Defendant: (a) operated the said commercial sex acts around 17:50 on the Internet site, advertised the said business on the Internet site “E”; (b) reported and promised to do so; (c) received KRW 75,00 from F, a customer who found and received KRW 75,00 from the female employee B, and had the female employee B contact with the customer’s sexual organ by hand, thereby arranging commercial sex acts.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and place, received 50,000 won per customer from a business owner, and engaged in sexual traffic by using similarity intercourse, such as taking the sexual organ of F, a male hand into his hand, and taking into account the circumstances.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on control field photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., imprisonment and the concurrent imposition of fines (Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic) Defendant B: Article 21 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, and Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse (Defendants);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the defendants)

1. Persons who are not specially punished in the basic area (6 to 14 months) of the types of sexual traffic subject to the recommendation type (Defendant A) on the sentencing guidelines and the types of sexual traffic subject to the age of not less than 19 and mediation, etc. of sexual traffic;

2. The summary order date even after Defendant A operated the instant sexual traffic business establishment from August 30, 2014 to September 2, 2014 and was investigated in violation of the School Health Act.