logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.17 2015가합518688
공제금지급청구
Text

1. The Defendants: (a) each Plaintiff KRW 55,200,000; and (b) Defendant B and C with respect thereto from July 31, 2013, and Defendant.

Reasons

(c) shall be.

(2) On November 19, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement and paid KRW 300,000,000 as the down payment to E on the same day - the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement between E and E on November 19, 2012, with the content that the Plaintiff leases the old city F, G, H site and buildings (IMoel) (hereinafter “instant site”) and the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”) from E as follows (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). The Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with E on November 26, 201 as the remainder payment: KRW 850,00,000; KRW 300,000; KRW 50,000; KRW 50,000; KRW 300,000; KRW 50,000; KRW 300,000; and KRW 300,000; KRW 150,000; KRW 15,205,000.

() Although a security trust has been made in the future but the trust was terminated by December 15, 2012 with a bank loan and the trust was terminated, the registration of ownership transfer will be made in the future E, and the Plaintiff’s claim to return the lease deposit shall be established with respect to the right to lease on a deposit basis. At the time of mediating the instant lease contract, Defendant C acquired the original trust register kept in E’s office from E at the time of arranging the instant lease contract, and copied the real estate security trust contract, real estate mark, etc. among them to the Plaintiff, and the documents issued to the Plaintiff at the time were modified as of August 2, 201 (the following).

not mentioned in this subsection.

Defendant C. The instant case

arrow