1. All part of the judgment of the court of first instance, Defendant A, B, and C are reversed. A.

Defendant

A, each law of the judgment of the court below.

1. As to Defendant A

A. Summary of the Reasons for Appeal 1) Judgment of misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles 1. A.

There was no perception of the intention or illegality of the illegal act because the public official in charge of the election commission notified the public official in charge of the election commission of the contents of the bill and sent it with the revision.

(2) No one has dispatched a warehouse of 9,000 copies to him/her.

B) As to the crime No. 1. b. (b) of the holding, there is no fact that one million won has been paid to B under the pretext of acceptance expenses. ② Even if it is recognized that one million won has been paid, B shall not be the other party to the contribution act. C)

There is no fact that 4 million won has been paid to R under the pretext of speech acceptance expenses, and there is no fact that CA has paid 78,000 won for R’s meal expenses from March 29, 2012 to April 10, 2012.

② With respect to the crime No. 1. D. (1) as indicated in the judgment, the facts charged are not specified (1) 1.D. (1) 1,893,33 won No. 1,893,333 of the table No. 1. D. as indicated in the judgment. (2) The election expenses are less than 1.350,00 won in good faith so that he does not enjoy it to the elected. (3) The election expenses are less than 34,658,824 won and 2.5 billion won and less than 1 ton of the motor vehicle as indicated in the judgment. (19,80,000 won and 1 ton of the above motor vehicle as indicated in the judgment. (4) The election expenses are less than 1,350,000 won and less than 40,000 won from March 21, 2012 to 40,000 won from March 21, 2014.

(4) The judgment No. 1. D.

No. 80,000 won No. 700,000 won in personal E.