logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.22 2017나2036466
대여금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the statement in this case is as follows, except for adding the judgment of the defendant on the defendant's argument, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the column of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is accepted by the main text

The defendant's act of receiving the loan certificate of this case from the defendant using the time when the plaintiff and the defendant were in a relationship with the plaintiff Eul, and there was no economic confusion due to the enormous occurrence of the plaintiff, and thus, the act of accepting the loan certificate of this case by the defendant is revoked by the plaintiff's coercion, and it constitutes an unfair legal act, and is null and void as it constitutes an unfair legal act, and even though the amount not paid to the plaintiff is less than 300 million won, the act of preparing the loan certificate of this case with the plaintiff's erroneous knowledge of the amount not paid to the plaintiff is caused by the defendant's mistake, and therefore, the defendant's act of delivering the loan certificate of this case by the delivery of the above statement of grounds for appeal. Thus, the defendant's argument is insufficient to acknowledge the facts

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow