Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Attached Form

The term "criminal facts" is the same as the term of "criminal facts".

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Statement by a petitioner against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of transfer of the petition, written reply, and monthly salary;

1. Article 109(1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 44 subparag. 1 and Article 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits;

1. Article 40 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. As to the issue of the main text of Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant, who made a judgment on the issue of the main text of Article 186(1) of the said Act, paid KRW 80,000 per month a salary of KRW 1.2 million as an incentive, and thereafter, paid only an incentive without a benefit from December 2014, the facts charged on the premise of monthly wage of KRW 2 million are different.

The argument is asserted.

In light of the fact that the Defendant paid KRW 2 million a month to C for a long time after initial employment, the Defendant’s wife prepared and presented a monthly wage of KRW 2 million on the premise that the Defendant’s wife paid KRW 2 million a month salary, the Defendant’s account payable at the police level of KRW 2 million on the basis of the monthly salary, the Defendant recognized the Defendant’s account payable at the police level of KRW 2 million in the investigative agency, the Defendant did not mention all matters concerning the incentive agreement, but the Defendant did not mention all matters concerning the incentive agreement, and the Defendant did not clearly state the specific contents of the incentive agreement in this court, etc., the Defendant can be fully convicted of the charge, and the above assertion by the Defendant cannot be accepted.