A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Since July 21, 2015, the Defendant: (a) since 21:30 on July 13, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was under the influence of the Defendant’s road in front of the Sinju Young-gu Young-gu Mamamamamamban apartment, and (c) was under the influence of the Defendant’s vehicle at a speed of 5-10km/h of the Sinju-si, and was under the influence of the alcohol, the Defendant was under the F-owned G, which was parked on the right edge of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the right edge of the vehicle, and was under the influence of the XG car.

After the accident, the Defendant was discussed about F and F’s employees of the insurance company and the dealing with the accident after drinking alcohol again from the site. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant received a report from 112 from the F and F’s employees, who were in progress, on July 14, 2015, and received a request for a drinking test at around 00:0:0:05 p.m., on July 14, 2015, as a result of a reduction of drinking alcohol from the I to the H district of the Cheongju-gu Police Station H district, the Cheongju-si, who was called to the site on July 14, 2015. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant received a request for a drinking test at will as the H district and received a request for a drinking test at around 30:30:05 p.m. 1, 2004, 105:301, 305:15:36 p.m.

Nevertheless, the Defendant refused to take a breath test by refusing to take a breath test because he/she is not driving after drinking alcohol, but drinking after an accident, and failed to comply with a police officer's request for a breath test without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. A manual of control of I;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. A written report from an employee of an employer;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning rejection of measurement;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation.