Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 23,507,299 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from August 28, 2018 to March 4, 2021, and from March 5, 2021.
Reasons
The occurrence of liability
A. Basic facts (1) On December 2013, 2013, the Plaintiff, a worker affiliated with D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “D”) executing construction works for a building C at Changwon-si, Changwon-si, as a person who was a staff member of D (hereinafter “D”) around December 17:10 on December 4, 2013, 200 assist the Plaintiff in carrying out concrete mixing with retaining walls for a lower part on the wall side (1.8m in height) of the 2nd underground floor of the construction site at the above construction site.
(2) Since the above field was very difficult to be kept underground, D, even though lighting facilities are sufficiently installed to secure workers with sufficient sights, the Plaintiff was placed at the edge of the wind, which was stopped on the upper part of the retaining wall, and the Plaintiff was unable to accurately know the state of concrete that is breaking the retaining wall into the lower part of the retaining wall on his hand, and was placed at this time with two fingers, etc., and the part of concrete mixing with concrete (one life bom) emitted from the concrete mixed truck, and then fell down with the lower part of the retaining wall, which is vadi, which is hot to vadi, (hereinafter “the instant accident”).
(3) Due to the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as a closed acute trauma surgery requiring approximately six weeks’ medical treatment, and a closed trauma surgery, and a closed external trauma surgery, the left-hand eromatic ero-pathic ero-pathic ero-pathic ero-pathic ero-pathic eropos
(4) On October 15, 2013, D entered into a worker’s accident mutual aid agreement as indicated below (hereinafter “instant mutual aid agreement”) with the Defendant.
DD E EF / without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2-1 through 5, Gap evidence No. 4, Gap evidence No. 6-1 and 6-2, witness G testimony and the purport of the whole pleadings.
나. 위 인정사실에 의하면, 이 사건 사고는 이 사건 공사 현장이 앞을 전혀 식별할 수 없을 정도로 깜깜 한 지하공간이므로 시야를 확보하여 공사가 가능할 정도로 조명을 설치하여야...